Philip1944 wrote: ↑March 6th, 2024, 2:14 pm
PAC20240624.JPG
I love it, and if it's good the price is well below norm.
Some concerns about the dial: the text doesn't look quite right.
I may be the photo distorting, but look at the dash between GMT and MASTER: it's not central.
Compare the lettering with a 1961 1675 on Chrono24. I placed your image alongside and enlarged.
Also the lumed hour bar at 9 does not look precisely edged.
Needs input from other Rlx fans more expert than me. Good luck!
Apples and oranges mate, these are two different dials from different periods. Rolex has so many transitional dials. So they literally have to be exact for comparison.
Lume doesn't play nice over time when it comes to tritium.
Here are my thoughts. My experience has said if it's too good to be true and is from a seller you don't know or doesn't have a reference it's good to question everything. Check the movement to make sure it is correct for the production date period. Do a light test on the lume to see how it reacts to light and how quickly it goes dark....tritium acts differently to modern lume. Find pictures of GMT's from the same year and cross check, compare engravings on the interior case back and in between the lugs. Check the back of the dial.
Sadly the Homage Hobby has really opened the door to bad actors and we need to check, recheck, check again and get other eyes on everything.
I own a 1978 Rolex 1655 explorer II " Steve McQueen" a 2008 MK1 Deep Sea and a 2017 James Cameron Deep Sea. I've owned multiple subs and have owned a 1675 GMT. You gotta check everything these days, not just the normal routine stuff.
I would say the price without the original bracelet and a private "Cash" sale are not too far off from what a dealer would pay. GMT are also taking a nose dive right now.
“Shit. If this is gonna be that kind of party, I’m gonna stick my dick in the mashed potatoes.”
-Mantan Moreland